The student as interpreter of the digital age: Emerging meanings in the educational use of artificial intelligence at a public university in Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35622/Keywords:
artificial intelligence, educational technology, higher education, self-learning, university studentAbstract
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education raises pedagogical, ethical, and formative questions that need to be understood from students’ own experiences and perceptions. The aim was to interpret the meanings that university students construct regarding their active role in the educational use of artificial intelligence in the digital era. Using a qualitative approach, a hermeneutic phenomenological design was adopted, drawing on six in-depth interviews and one focus group with four participants, conducted with advanced students from the Special Education teacher-training program at the National University of Misiones, selected through purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and the analysis was carried out through an interpretive thematic categorization process. The results show that AI is understood as a tool that mediates learning rather than as a substitute for human reasoning. In their accounts, participants tend to describe reflective and metacognitive practices, as well as self-regulation strategies, which strengthen their agency and intellectual autonomy in the learning process. Likewise, ethical concerns related to authorship, academic honesty, and the risk of technological dependence are interpreted, along with the expressed need for institutional guidance and spaces for ethical training. In conclusion, these meanings suggest the advisability of integrating AI through humanistic pedagogical approaches aimed at promoting critical thinking, ethical responsibility, and active learning, recognizing students as reflective subjects capable of constructing meaning in complex digital environments.
References
Aguilar Ponce, Y. A. (2025). Uso de chatbots de inteligencia artificial generativa en actividades de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Científica Avances en Ciencia y Docencia, 2(Especial), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.70939/revistadiged.v2iEspecial.49
Álvarez Hernández, G. & Pérez Velasco, A. (2024). Percepciones del estudiantado universitario en el uso y apropiación de la inteligencia artificial. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 25(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v25i1.6062
Astuti, W., & Nikmah, S. Z. (2025). Students’ perspective on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in academic writing. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(3), 1216–1221. https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JUPE/article/view/9441
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bayne, S. (2015). Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783
Carrasco Valenzuela, A. C., Martínez García, V. M., Vázquez Meza, J. A., & Díaz Romero, Y. (2024). Percepción de los estudiantes sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en el nivel superior. Revista Digital de Tecnologías Informáticas y Sistemas, 8(1), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.61530/redtis.vol8.n1.2024.187
Chaaban, Y., Badwan, K., & Arar, K. (2025). Educational leadership for social justice: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Review of Education, 13(2), e70077. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70077
Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261-262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y
Gadamer, H. G. (1998). Verdad y método II. Ediciones Sígueme.
Hernández Coló, M. del R., & Chávez Romero, E. (2025). Análisis de la percepción estudiantil sobre la inteligencia artificial generativa en la formación universitaria: hacia una práctica ética e informada. Decires, 25(34), 55–102. https://doi.org/10.22201/cepe.14059134e.2025.25.34.461
Lan, M. & Zhou, X. (2025). A qualitative systematic review on AI empowered self-regulated learning in higher education. npj Science of Learning, 10(21), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0
Liang, H. & Reiss, M. (2025). Associações entre as atitudes dos alunos em relação à IA e o engajamento com a aprendizagem: papéis mediadores seriais da autonomia percebida e do prazer na aprendizagem. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1681635
Mena de la Rosa, R., Cruz-Romero, R., & Silva-Payró, M. P. (2024). Percepción de la inteligencia artificial por estudiantes universitarios como acompañante en el proceso de aprendizaje. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-738
Muñoz Martínez, C., Roger-Monzo, V., & Castelló Sirvent, F. (2025). Generative AI and critical thinking in online higher education: Challenges and opportunities. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(2), 233–273. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43556
Niño-Carrasco, S. A., Castellanos-Ramírez, J. C., Perezchica Vega, J. E., & Sepúlveda Rodríguez, J. A. (2025). Percepciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre los usos de inteligencia artificial en educación. Revista Fuentes, 27(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2025.26356
Niu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., & Chen, X. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence autonomy in higher education: A uses and gratification perspective. Sustainability, 16(3), 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031276
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2023). Guía para el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación y la investigación. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389201
Ortiz Chimbo, K., García Viteri, R., & Párraga Cepeda, R. (2025). Liderazgo transformacional en la calidad educativa: Un estudio en instituciones de educación superior. Revista Científica y Arbitrada de Ciencias Sociales y Trabajo Social: Tejedora, 8(19), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.56124/tj.v8i19.035
Pitts, G., Marcus, V. y Motamedi, S. (2025). Student perspectives on the benefits and risks of AI in education. [Preprint]. arXiv:2505.02198. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02198
Ravi, M., Kaur, K., Wright, C. et al. (2025). Perspectivas del personal y estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso competente y ético de la IA: descubriendo similitudes y divergencias. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 22(25), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00557-7
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
Reina Marín, Y., Cruz Caro, O., Carrasco Rituay, A. M., Sánchez Bardales, E., Alva Tuesta, J. N., & Chávez Santos, R. (2025). Ethical challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence in university education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09660-w
Sabando-García, Á. R., Olguín-Martínez, C. M., Benavides-Lara, R. M., Salazar-Echeagaray, T. I., Huerta-Mora, E. A., Bumbila-García, B. B., Cedeño-Barcia, L. A., & Moreira-Choez, J. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence for determining learning strategies in university students. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1611189. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1611189
Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Perceptions and use of AI chatbots among students in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080922
Schutz, A. (1974). El problema de la realidad social (1ª ed.). Amorrortu.
Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
Sucari Turpo, W., Sucari Turpo, H. A., Calsin Apaza, M. M., Mamani Condori, J. M., Choque Copari, C. A., & Gil Quispe, I. B. (2024). Paradigmas y métodos de la investigación científica (1ª ed.). Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú. https://doi.org/10.35622/inudip.013
Tierney, A., Peasey, P., & Gould, J. (2025). Student perceptions on the impact of AI on their teaching and learning experiences in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20005
Van Manen, M. (2003). Investigación educativa y experiencia vivida (1ª ed.). Idea Educación.
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2006). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa (1ª ed.). Gedisa.
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Wadmany, R., & Davidovitch, N. (2025). Students’ ethical perceptions of artificial intelligence use: An opportunity for developing a personal ethical compass. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(4), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.53935/2641533x.v8i4.440
Zambrana Copaja, R., Salinas Montemayor, A. D., Macías García, F. A., & Ernesto Escobar, E. (2026). Inteligencia artificial en la educación superior para promover un aprendizaje personalizado e inclusivo: una revisión sistemática. Revista InveCom, 6(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16147008
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fabiana Gilardoni, Manuel Morocho Malla, Decired Ojeda Pertuz (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





















